Minutes of the 2/27/03 Meeting of the SV-BC. This is my list of attendees and voting status. Please submit corrections to johny.srouji@intel.com: (a_aaaaaaaa________) Johny Srouji (Intel) * (__aaaaa__aaa_aaaaa) Cliff Cummings (Sunburst Design) * (a____a___aaaaaaaaa) David Smith (Synopsys) (aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa) Karen Pieper (Synopsys) * (__aaaaaaaaaaaaaa_a) Kevin Cameron (NSC) * (_aaa_a_aaaaaaaaa_a) Steven Sharp (Cadence) (____a___aaaaa_aaa_) Dennis Brophy (Model Technology) (_______a__a___aaaa) Tom Fitzpatrick (Co_Design) (aaaaaa_aaaaaa____a) Gord Vreugdenhil (Synopsys) * (aaaaaaaaaaaaa_____) Brad Pierce (Synopsys) * (aaaaaaaaaa_a____aa) Francoise Martinolle (Cadence) * (__aaaaa_aa_______a) Don Mills (LCDM Engineering) * (__________aa__aa__) Mike McNamara (Verisity) (a___________aaaaaa) Stefen Boyd (Boyd Technology) (_______a_____aa___) Medi Mohtashemi (Synopsys) (_____________aa___) Paul Graham (Cadence) (a______a_____aaaaa) Peter Flake (Synopsys) (a____________aaaa_) Simon Davidmann (IEEE) (_____________aa__a) Heath Chambers (HMC) (______________aaa_) Dave Kelf (Co_Design) (___a_a_a_______aaa) Vasisilios Gerousis (Seimens) (__aaaaa_a_________) Dan Jacobi (Intel) * (_______a__________) Stuart Swan (Cadence) (_______a__________) Adam Krolnick (aaa_aaaa__________) David Rich (Synopsys) * (_______a__________) Yong Xiao (Synopsys) (a_aaaa_a__________) Jay Lawrence (Cadence) * (aaaaa__a__________) Matt Maidment (Intel) (_______a__________) Wolfgang Keil (Synopsys) (______a___________) Alec F. Stanculescu (Fintronic) * indicates eligible to vote on consensus issues ** SV-BC BNF meeting on 01/29/03 was not taken into account for attendance. Minutes of the 2/24/03 Meeting Karen moves that we accept the minutes of the 2/24/03 meeting. Dave seconds. No opposed. Jay abstains. Passes. Open issues: SV-BC43: This is the same as Cliff's request we've already indicated he needs to forward to the EC. SV-BC44-02: Closed as same as 44-01. SV-BC44-04: Karen moves that we close this issue as not addressable by our committee. Brad seconds. No opposed. No abstain. Passes. SV-BC44-05: Karen moves that we close this issue already approved as a language extension. Johny seconds. Jay is opposed. No abstain. Passes. SV-BC44-07: Karen moves that we close this because of earlier decision that unnamed blocks were ok. Matt seconds. No opposed. No abstain. Passes. SV-BC44-08: Brad moves that we close this issue as not addressable by our committee. Dave seconds. No opposed. No abstain. Passes. SV-BC44-10: Karen moves that we follow the IEEE and say nothing (hence, closing this issue). Johny seconds. No opposed. No abstain. Passes. SV-BC44-13: Iff is useful in clocking domains where procedural checks are not possible. Karen moves that we close the issue as clarified. Dave seconds. No opposed. No abstain. Passes. SV-BC44-14: We agree that there is an issue is here. Jay moves that we replace the paragraph in Section 8.9: If a variable or net is not of type logic, then posedge and negedge refer to transitions from 0 and to 0 respectively. If the variable or net is a packed array or structure, it is zero if all elements are 0. With: If a variable is not of a 4-state type, then posedge and negedge refer to transitions from 0 and to 0 respectively. Dave seconds. No opposed. No abstain. Passes. SV-BC44-16: Karen moves that we close this as the same as 44-01. Johny seconds. No opposed. No abstain. Passes. SV-BC47. Dave moves we close this as the same as 62c. Karen seconds. No opposed. No abstain. Passes. SV-BC52: Dave moves this is the same as 56. Karen seconds. No opposed. No abstain. Passes. SV-BC53: Peter will propose new language. SV-BC61a: Peter will propose new language. SV-BC63: Dave to propose. SV-BC64: Matt moves we fix the BNF to one dimension. Brad will make the proposal. SV-BC69: Dan to propose. SV-BC71: Karen moves that we accept the proposal in message 466. Gord seconds. Francoise is opposed. Jay abstains. Passes. SV-BC77: Johny moves that we approve message 537 in principle. Karen seconds. No opposed. No abstain. Passes. Peter will develop formal language. SV-BC44-03: Dave moves that this issue is already addressed in 3.1v3. Brad seconds. No opposed. No abstain. Passes. SV-BC44-06: Karen moves that in 8.7(in 3.1v3) we remove the sentence A statment label does not create a hierarchy scope. and This is not the same as a block name, however because it does not create a hierarchy scope. Brad seconds. No opposed. No abstain. Passes. SV-BC44-11,12: Johny moves that In Section 8.5 AFTER "jumps out of the loop" Insert "The continue and break statements cannot be used inside a fork...join block to control a loop outside the fork...join block. Brad seconds. No opposed. No abstain. Passes.