>My suggestion is to document a policy for setting priorities in the next PAR.
I'm all for that, as in
http://www.eda.org/sv-ieee1800/hm/0936.html
>Those that clarify existing features of the standard and lead
>towards consistent implementations should have highest priority.
That metric won't pay the bills, because users quickly figure out ways to work around vendor oddities, even if they grumble as they do so.
What they are demanding today are solutions to the design productivity gap.
-- Brad
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Tue Jan 26 19:04:00 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jan 26 2010 - 19:04:16 PST