RE: [sv-bc] Should Ref declaration not use list_of_variable_port_identifiers

Surya,

I agree this was an oversight, but if you make the proposed correction,
you need to make sure there is a semantic restriction that prevents a
default assignment to a ref port.

Dave





> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org]
On
> Behalf Of Surya Pratik Saha
> Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 3:49 AM
> To: sv-bc@eda.org
> Subject: [sv-bc] Should Ref declaration not use
> list_of_variable_port_identifiers
> 
> Hi,
> In the SV 1800-2009-draft 7a LRM, the ref declaration rule is defined
as:
> 
> ref_declaration ::= ref variable_port_type list_of_port_identifiers
> 
> But I think, it should use list_of_variable_port_identifiers so that
> following example becomes legal:
> 
> module top(x);
>     ref logic x[$];
> endmodule
> 
> If this is an oversight of LRM then I will file a Mantis for that.
> 
> --
> Regards
> Surya
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.