Re: [sv-bc] Query related with attribute instance along with timeunits_declaration.

From: Surya Pratik Saha <spsaha_at_.....>
Date: Tue Oct 20 2009 - 00:58:26 PDT

Hi,
I filed Mantis 2905 regarding this.

Regards
Surya

-------- Original Message  --------
Subject: Re:[sv-bc] Query related with attribute instance along with timeunits_declaration.
From: Bresticker, Shalom <shalom.bresticker@intel.com>
To: Dhiraj Kumar Prasad <dhiraj@cal.interrasystems.com>, sv-bc@server.eda.org <sv-bc@eda.org>
Cc: Surya Pratik Saha <spsaha@cal.interrasystems.com>
Date: Tuesday, October 20, 2009 11:59:33 AM

Yes, it looks like a bug in the BNF.

Thanks,
Shalom 

  

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org 
[mailto:owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Dhiraj Kumar Prasad
Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2009 7:54 AM
To: sv-bc@server.eda.org
Cc: Dhiraj Kumar Prasad; Surya Pratik Saha
Subject: [sv-bc] Query related with attribute instance along 
with timeunits_declaration.

Hello,

I have query related with timeunits_declaration.According to IEEE LRM 
P1800.2005,section
16.2

non_port_program_item ::=
..
{ attribute_instance } timeunits_declaration

Means attribute instance can be specified along with 
timeunits_declaration.

According to BNF,nowhere attribute instance can be specified 
along with  
timeunits_declaration except
non port program item but most of standard tool fail for the 
following 
testcase.

program prog1();

(*a,b*)timeunit 1ns;
endprogram

So my query is this that does the testcase is valid or it's 
bug in BNF??.

Regards,
dhiRAj

 



-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.


    

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.





  

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean. Received on Tue Oct 20 00:59:44 2009