I've fixed the illegal param decl in 2667 and uploaded a _v2 with that change. I've added a comma to the sentence that Brad wanted fixed in 2677 and uploaded a _v2 version. I vote yes on all the proposals except (my own) 2667 due to the illegal parameter example. The _v2 version could be approved in the meeting. Gord. Maidment, Matthew R wrote: [...] > > SVDB 2664 _X_Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2664 > > SVDB 2666 _X_Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2666 > > SVDB 2667 ___Yes _X_No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2667 Illegal parameter decl. > > SVDB 2668 _X_Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2668 > > SVDB 2677 _X_Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2677 > > SVDB 2690 _X_Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2690 > Proposal: Resolved by 1492 > -- -------------------------------------------------------------------- Gordon Vreugdenhil 503-685-0808 Model Technology (Mentor Graphics) gordonv@model.com -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Mon Jun 8 07:48:40 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jun 08 2009 - 07:50:53 PDT