SVDB 2664 _X__Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2664 SVDB 2666 _X__Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2666 SVDB 2667 ___Yes _X__No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2667 I think the wording of this proposal is confusing. For example: "If a module instance overrides a type parameter, assignments to parameters that depend on the type parameter shall not occur with the default type." I think what this is trying to say is if a parameter assignment would be illegal with the default type, it is not an error as long as the type parameter is always overridden with a type that makes it legal. SVDB 2668 _X__Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2668 SVDB 2677 _X__Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2677 SVDB 2690 _X__Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2690 Proposal: Resolved by 1492 -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Sun Jun 7 15:27:21 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Jun 07 2009 - 15:28:18 PDT