For the first set, 'Yes' on all except SVDB 1791 ___Yes __X_No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2791 'integer' and '$sscanf' are misspelled, and Shalom has suggested that the 32 should only be 31 SVDB 2678 ___Yes _X__No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2678 not clear which whitespace character is required, should be more specific and require '\040' not clear enough about cases like typedef enum {\bronze , \silver , \gold } T; Also in 2721, it would be better to say "bind directive" instead of "bind statement", because it's not a statement. But there is precedent for "bind statement", so I still vote 'Yes'. For the second set, 'Yes' on all except SVDB 2669 ___Yes _X__No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2669 There's still time to deprecate `timescale SVDB 2690 ___Yes _X__No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2690 Isn't this a duplicate of 1492? -----Original Message----- From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On Behalf Of Maidment, Matthew R Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 12:41 PM To: sv-bc@eda.org Subject: [sv-bc] E-mail Vote: Respond by Monday, May 11, 2009 8am PDT -You have until 8am PDT, Monday, May 11, 2009 to respond -An issue passes if there are zero NO votes and half of the eligible voters respond with a YES vote. -If you vote NO on any issue, your vote must be accompanied by a reason. The issue will then be up for discussion during a future conference call. -Note: For some issues, the proposed action is captured in the bug note (resolve as duplicate, already addressed, etc.). As of the May 04, 2009 meeting, the eligible voters are: Brad Pierce Mark Hartoog Dave Rich Gordon Vreugdenhil Stu Sutherland Alex Gran Heath Chambers Tom Alsop Francoise Martinolle Cliff Cummings Shalom Bresticker Don Mills Steven Sharp Proposals: 1651, 1791, 2501, 2568, 2611, 2674, 2681, 2721 SVDB 1651 ___Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1651 SVDB 1791 ___Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2791 SVDB 2501 ___Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2501 SVDB 2568 ___Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2568 SVDB 2593 ___Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2593 SVDB 2611 ___Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2611 SVDB 2674 ___Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2674 SVDB 2678 ___Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2678 SVDB 2681 ___Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2681 SVDB 2721 ___Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2721 The following Mantis items are proposed to be resolved as: "The committee read and considered this feedback. the committee believes it is too broad for the scope of the draft to implement at this time but may be considered for future revisions." SVDB 2580 ___Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2580 SVDB 2669 ___Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2669 SVDB 2671 ___Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2671 SVDB 2673 ___Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2673 SVDB 2679 ___Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2679 SVDB 2684 ___Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2684 SVDB 2686 ___Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2686 SVDB 2687 ___Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2687 SVDB 2688 ___Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2688 SVDB 2689 ___Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2689 SVDB 2690 ___Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2690 SVDB 2691 ___Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2691 SVDB 2697 ___Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2697 SVDB 2720 ___Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2720 -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Mon May 4 15:24:46 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon May 04 2009 - 15:27:03 PDT