[sv-bc] RE: Mantis 1492

From: Brad Pierce <Brad.Pierce_at_.....>
Date: Mon May 04 2009 - 08:37:30 PDT
Yes, that would be an improvement.

-- Brad

________________________________
From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On Behalf Of Bresticker, Shalom [shalom.bresticker@intel.com]
Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 1:01 AM
To: SV_BC List
Subject: [sv-bc] Mantis 1492

I'd like to propose rewording of the proposal for Mantis 1492 at today's meeting. Instead of

Specific local variables can be declared as automatic within a static task and specific local variables can be declared as static within an automatic task.
and
Specific local variables can be declared as automatic within a static function and specific local variables can be declared as static within an automatic function.

I think the following is equvalent but nicer:

Specific local variables can be declared as automatic within a static task or as static within an automatic task.
and
Specific local variables can be declared as automatic within a static function or as static within an automatic function.

Shalom

Shalom Bresticker
Intel LAD DA
Jerusalem, Israel
+972  2 589 6582 (office)
+972 54 721 1033 (cell)



---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.


--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner<http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
believed to be clean.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Mon May 4 08:38:37 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon May 04 2009 - 08:39:26 PDT