RE: Mantis 2593 about non-ANSI port declarations (Was: [sv-bc] Mantis 1111, omitting range on port declaration)

From: Brad Pierce <Brad.Pierce_at_.....>
Date: Sat May 02 2009 - 11:41:21 PDT
OK, let's start with the proposal to remove the restriction of BNF footnote 15.  Wouldn't that be an enhancement?

-- Brad

________________________________________
From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On Behalf Of Bresticker, Shalom [shalom.bresticker@intel.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 02, 2009 11:14 AM
To: SV_BC List
Subject: RE: Mantis 2593 about non-ANSI port declarations (Was: [sv-bc] Mantis 1111, omitting range on port declaration)

I have not yet received any comments on my non-ANSI port declaration "declaration of principles" in http://www.eda-stds.org/sv-bc/hm/9427.html.

Did people receive it at all?

Shalom
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.


--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Sat May 2 11:43:27 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat May 02 2009 - 11:44:04 PDT