RE: Mantis 2593 about non-ANSI port declarations (Was: [sv-bc] Mantis 1111, omitting range on port declaration)

From: Brad Pierce <Brad.Pierce_at_.....>
Date: Wed Apr 29 2009 - 09:35:26 PDT
> That would be if the port declaration included only the port name.

Yes, that's what I mean. I'm not convinced the following is bad practice.

   input in1;
   wire [5:0] in1;

> It would come out automatically by implementing the LRM as specified.

I'm not convinced that the draft LRM under ballot allows that practice.

-- Brad




-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Wed Apr 29 09:52:26 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Apr 29 2009 - 09:53:13 PDT