Shouldn't it be "integral expression"? Dmitry -----Original Message----- From: owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of John Havlicek Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 2:27 AM To: sv-bc@server.eda.org; sv-ec@server.eda.org; sv-ac@server.eda.org Subject: [sv-ec] question about integer expression Hi Folks: The LRM uses the phrases "integer expression" and "constant integer expression" a number of places in Clauses 6, 7, and 11 in describing indexing into vectors and arrays and bit- and part-selects. I could not find a definition of "integer expression". Can anyone comment on whether "integer expression" is intended to limit the result of the expression evaluation to what can be stored in the 32-bit integer data type? I think that the answer should be "no". There is a presentation of "integer types" in Clause 6.11, and it is clear that "integer type" is not limited to 32 bits (could be shorter or longer). A prompt reply is greatly appreciated, John Havlicek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Wed Apr 1 23:05:28 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Apr 01 2009 - 23:07:05 PDT