[sv-bc] RE: [sv-ec] class_qualifier is not used anywhere

You're right!

This took me a little while to find.

The origin of class_qualifier is in Mantis 1858.

The proposal contains an additional change that was by mistake not colored, so that both the editor and the reviewer missed it.

The change is from:

primary ::=
          primary_literal
        | [ implicit_class_handle . | class_scope | package_scope ] hierarchical_identifier select
        ...

TO

primary ::=
          primary_literal
        | [class_qualifier | package_scope] hierarchical_identifier select
        ...

The affected line appears only in Annex A.

This is obviously a pure editorial correction and should be fixed in the ballot version.

It would be nice to put on Mantis a new version of the proposal with the coloring fixed.

Thanks,
Shalom

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org
> [mailto:owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Moumita Das
> Sent: Monday, January 05, 2009 1:09 PM
> To: sv-bc@server.eda.org; sv-ec@server.eda.org
> Subject: [sv-ec] class_qualifier is not used anywhere
>
> Hello,
>
> In SV 2009 draft LRM, I have found the following BNF -
>
> class_qualifier := [ local:: ] [ implicit_class_handle . |
> class_scope ]
>
> But I have not seen any usage of this rule(class_qualifier).
>
> Am I missing anything?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.