RE: [sv-bc] Question on mandatory "static" to declare intent

From: Bresticker, Shalom <shalom.bresticker_at_.....>
Date: Wed Dec 31 2008 - 07:27:33 PST
As a curiosity, we had a case where we were still burned using = instead of == because it was enclosed in parentheses anyway.

The extra parentheses greatly reduce the risk of hitting this gotcha, but do not eliminate it entirely.

> The required extra set of
> parenthesis around an assignment within a expression is
> another good example.

Shalom
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Wed Dec 31 07:29:09 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Dec 31 2008 - 07:29:38 PST