RE: [sv-bc] declaration vs reference order issue

From: Bresticker, Shalom <shalom.bresticker_at_.....>
Date: Sat Sep 06 2008 - 12:30:24 PDT
Yes, I had forgotten that part of 1809.
Rereading that text, I feel that a large part of it should have been in
clause 22 instead of clause 25, but it is too late to change that for
this ballot.

Shalom
 

>  From 1809:
> 
>     For a reference to an identifier other than function or task call,
>     the locally visible identifiers defined at the point of 
> the reference
>     in the current scope shall be searched. ...
> 
>     If no locally visible identifiers match, then the 
> potentially locally
>     visible identifiers defined prior to the point of the 
> reference in the
>     current scope shall be searched. ...
> 
>     If the reference is not found within the current scope, 
> the next outer
>     lexical scope shall be searched; ...
> 
> The rules here are clearly based from "the point of 
> reference" in the first part.  Certainly that was the intent 
> of all of the rules and all the special case rules for task 
> and function "forward" resolution.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Sat Sep 6 12:32:04 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Sep 06 2008 - 12:32:57 PDT