RE: [sv-bc] merge error on timescale

Not every compilation unit has to have a timescale defined. I don't
think it is clear when it does and when it does not.

Shalom 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steven Sharp [mailto:sharp@cadence.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 11:29 PM
> To: sharp@cadence.com; sv-bc@eda.org; Bresticker, Shalom
> Subject: RE: [sv-bc] merge error on timescale
> 
> 
> >From: "Bresticker, Shalom" <shalom.bresticker@intel.com>
> 
> >In Draft 5, 3.13.2.3 says,
> >
> >"It shall be an error if some design elements have a time unit and 
> >precision specified and others do not."
> 
> Thanks.  I had not looked in the right place.  The text is 
> close to what I would have expected.
> 
> The term "design element" does not include the compilation 
> unit.  That leaves a minor hole, where a user might forget to 
> specify a timescale for the compilation unit, and then be 
> puzzled by the results.  But I think trying to include the 
> compilation unit in the requirement could create other problems.
> 
> Steven Sharp
> sharp@cadence.com
> 
> 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.