So then the BC will meet June 2 and 23. Due to the amount of work left, the BC needs to have an additional meeting on (or extend the June 23 meeting to) June 30. June 2 meet June 23 (back on track with regular meetings) June 30 (additional meeting for BC only) Any objections? Matt -- Matt Maidment mmaidmen@ichips.intel.com >-----Original Message----- >From: Mehdi Mohtashemi [mailto:Mehdi.Mohtashemi@synopsys.com] >Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 1:41 PM >To: Maidment, Matthew R; Gordon Vreugdenhil >Cc: stuart@sutherland-hdl.com; sv-bc@eda.org >Subject: RE: [sv-bc] next meeting scheduled for US Memorial Day Holiday > >I believe it would be ok to do 16th, however, many will >be at DAC during the week before, so I suspect it would be >wiser to just have the 23rd, to get us back in sync. >If BC needs the extra meeting, then add the 30th for >this time around. Would this work? >- Mehd > >-----Original Message----- >From: Maidment, Matthew R [mailto:matthew.r.maidment@intel.com] >Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 1:34 PM >To: Gordon Vreugdenhil >Cc: stuart@sutherland-hdl.com; sv-bc@eda.org; Mehdi Mohtashemi >Subject: RE: [sv-bc] next meeting scheduled for US Memorial Day Holiday > > >Can the EC meet on the 16 or 30 instead of the 23rd? >BC needs the extra meeting. > > > >Matt >-- >Matt Maidment >mmaidmen@ichips.intel.com > > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Gordon Vreugdenhil [mailto:gordonv@model.com] >>Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 1:10 PM >>To: Maidment, Matthew R >>Cc: stuart@sutherland-hdl.com; sv-bc@server.eda.org; Mehdi Mohtashemi >>Subject: Re: [sv-bc] next meeting scheduled for US Memorial >Day Holiday >> >> >>Matt (and Mehdi): >> >>EC was tentatively planning to miss one meeting so that we would have: >> May 26 (no regular meeting) >> June 2 (meet) >> June 9 (no regular meeting) >> June 23 (back on track with regular meetings) >> >>If you would like to just shift to the 16th, etc. I don't have >>an objection, but I would like the BC/EC schedule to stay >>in sync. >> >>Gord. >> >>Maidment, Matthew R wrote: >>> June 2 is fine with me. If we do that, I'm inclined to meet >>> every-other-Monday from there on out (June 16, 30, July 14, 28). >>> >>> This avoids DAC week, too. >>> >>> Matt >>> -- >>> Matt Maidment >>> mmaidmen@ichips.intel.com >>> >>> >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Stuart Sutherland [mailto:stuart@sutherland-hdl.com] >>>> Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 12:54 PM >>>> To: Maidment, Matthew R; sv-bc@eda.org >>>> Subject: RE: [sv-bc] next meeting scheduled for US Memorial >>Day Holiday >>>> >>>> Matt, >>>> >>>> I have that time slot on Tuesday as reserved for an SV-SC >>>> conference call. >>>> The SV-EC has decided to postpone their meeting until June >>>> 2nd. For me, >>>> either 11:00 to 1:00 (PDT) on Tuesday would work, or the >>>> regular time on >>>> June 2nd. >>>> >>>> Stu >>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >>>> Stuart Sutherland >>>> stuart@sutherland-hdl.com >>>> +1-503-692-0898 >>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On >Behalf Of >>>>> Maidment, Matthew R >>>>> Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 11:05 AM >>>>> To: sv-bc@eda.org >>>>> Subject: [sv-bc] next meeting scheduled for US Memorial >Day Holiday >>>>> >>>>> Hi All. >>>>> >>>>> During the meeting I forgot to raise the issue that the next BC >>>>> meeting is scheduled for the US Memorial Day Holiday. >>>>> >>>>> I propose that we reschedule this meeting to Tuesday, May >>>> 27, 9am-11am >>>>> PDT. >>>>> >>>>> If there is enough dissent (including other suggestions), I will >>>>> propose >>>>> a new alternative. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> >>>>> Matt >>>>> -- >>>>> Matt Maidment >>>>> mmaidmen@ichips.intel.com >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> This message has been scanned for viruses and >>>>> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >>>>> believed to be clean. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >>-- >>-------------------------------------------------------------------- >>Gordon Vreugdenhil 503-685-0808 >>Model Technology (Mentor Graphics) gordonv@model.com >> >> > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Tue May 13 11:42:38 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue May 13 2008 - 11:42:52 PDT