RE: [sv-bc] 2008 changes will need Champion review of clause 12.5.3

From: Bresticker, Shalom <shalom.bresticker_at_.....>
Date: Wed Apr 30 2008 - 01:52:53 PDT
Tom,
 
He can't just copy and paste them. There are change bars to deal with,
the side boxes noting the Mantis numbers, font fixes (e.g., keywords
needs to be bold), red strikeouts disappear in Draft 6, and blue
additions in Draft 5 become black in Draft 6.
 
Shalom


________________________________

	From: owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org
[mailto:owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Bresticker, Shalom
	Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 5:52 AM
	To: Alsop, Thomas R; sv-bc
	Subject: RE: [sv-bc] 2008 changes will need Champion review of
clause 12.5.3
	
	
	Tom,
	 
	I have NOT yet looked at the new proposal, but I think it would
be enough to write in the Note to Editor that the proposal is relative
to Draft 5.
	 
	Shalom


________________________________

		From: owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org
[mailto:owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Alsop, Thomas R
		Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 3:53 AM
		To: sv-bc
		Subject: [sv-bc] 2008 changes will need Champion review
of clause 12.5.3
		
		

		Stu,

		 

		I have taken the previous version of this proposal and
now reworked it on top of Draft5. I have uploaded it to EDA.org. Here is
my note to the editor now:
		
		(Note to Editor: The sections below contain the changes
from Mantis items 1041, 1294, 2131, and 1345 are all merged into this
version of 2008. All these changes were done on top of Draft5. In
essence clause 12.4.2 and 12.5.3 can be cut and pasted into Draft6.
Clauses 12.4.2.1, 12.4.2.2, 12.5.3.1, and 12.5.3.2 are new to Draft6").
		
		I sifted through this one sentence at a time. I noticed
a couple of very subtle changes that I had to make in 12.5.3 on top of
what I already had in my proposal WRT to what I saw in Draft5. Enough
that I would ask the champions to review only this clause. All the other
clauses are okay.

		 

		In particular this sentence was added in the 4th
paragraph of 12.5.3 "If the case is qualified as unique0, the simulator
implementation shall not issue a violation report if no case item
case_item matches"  

		 

		I tried to be careful to keep the strikethroughs that
you had too.

		 

		Thanks, -Tom


		-- 
		This message has been scanned for viruses and 
		dangerous content by MailScanner
<http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is 
		believed to be clean. 

	
---------------------------------------------------------------------
	Intel Israel (74) Limited
	
	This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential
material for
	the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or
distribution
	by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
	recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

	-- 
	This message has been scanned for viruses and 
	dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/>
, and is 
	believed to be clean. 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Wed Apr 30 01:55:18 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Apr 30 2008 - 01:56:01 PDT