Hi, > I think we should add to the list for this new committee (Erik) > > 9. 2173 > 10. 2326 > 11. 2327 Is this Erik's personal request or an SV-AC request? Who decides what issues the new sub-committee deals with? I don't think these are related to checkers or assertions in procedural code, so I would be reluctant to have the new sub-committee deal with these as well. I think it would be a diversion and a dilution of the work, which is going to be hard enough even without these additional issues. (It would be nice if this new sub-committee had a short name. It's awkward saying "the new techical sub-committee" alll the time...) Thanks, Shalom --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Sun Apr 6 00:24:02 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Apr 06 2008 - 00:27:58 PDT