I vote YES on 2008, but I do think that the example in 12.4.2.2 could be clarified. I believe the intention is that the 3 timesteps under discussion all occur at the same simulation time, and thus are iterating through the main scheduling loop without advancing time. That should be more clearly stated. If I'm wrong, then some other clarification needs to be made. Regards, Doug -----Original Message----- From: owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Maidment, Matthew R Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 11:51 PM To: sv-bc@server.eda.org Subject: [sv-bc] E-mail Ballot for SVDB 2008: Respond by 8am PST, Monday, March 3 -You have until 8am PST, Monday, March 3, 2008 to respond -An issue passes if there are zero NO votes and half of the eligible voters respond with a YES vote. -If you vote NO on any issue, your vote must be accompanied by a reason. The issue will then be up for discussion during a future conference call. -Note: For some issues, the proposed action is captured in the bug note (resolve as duplicate, already addressed, etc.). As of the February 18, 2008 meeting, the eligible voters are: Brad Pierce Shalom Bresticker Cliff Cummings Mark Hartoog Francoise Martinolle Karen Pieper Dave Rich Steven Sharp Gordon Vreugdenhil Stu Sutherland Alex Gran Don Mills Heath Chambers Tom Alsop Doug Warmke SVDB 2008 ___Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2008 -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Tue Feb 26 10:20:36 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Feb 26 2008 - 10:21:09 PST