Doug, Please see embedded comments. Rev8 uploaded with fixes. Thanks, -Tom >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org] On >Behalf Of Warmke, Doug >Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 5:14 PM >To: Maidment, Matthew R; Bresticker, Shalom; sv-bc@server.eda.org >Subject: RE: [sv-bc] e-mail ballot due Monday, Feb 18, 8AM PST > >Doug's votes: > >SVDB 1828 _X_Yes ___No >http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1828 > >SVDB 2008 _X_Yes ___No >http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2008 > >Friendly amendments: >1. The word "violation" in the sentence "If a violation report flush > point is reached in a process,..." should not be italicized. > (2nd to last sentence in 3rd paragraph of 12.4.2.1) [Alsop, Thomas R] Fixed. >2. The "u1" in the sentence "In this example, unique-if u1 is checking..." > should be "a1". Or, the example should have "a1" changed to "u1. > (End of 12.4.2.1) [Alsop, Thomas R] a1 is the label in the outer procedural block. u1 is the label used on the unique-if which is what the following sentence is referring to. >3. In the example in 12.4.2.2, the "end" at the end of "function bit foo" > should be "endfunction" [Alsop, Thomas R] Fixed. Thanks. >4. There should be more whitespace after the : in "...which may call >assertion > a1:b1 and b2". That is confusing-looking. > [Alsop, Thomas R] Space added. >SVDB 2219 _X_Yes ___No >http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2219 > >SVDB 2043 _X_Yes ___No >http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2043 > >SVDB 1564 _X_Yes ___No >http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1564 > > >-- >This message has been scanned for viruses and >dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >believed to be clean. > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Tue Feb 12 17:46:04 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Feb 12 2008 - 17:46:25 PST