RE: [sv-bc] e-mail ballot due Monday, Feb 18, 8AM PST

I'd like to stick with should based on its definition in the LRM.
Gord was in agreement on this:

http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/8024.html

IMO this is not a friendly amendment.  If you disagree, we should
bring this to the floor on Monday.

Matt
--
Matt Maidment
mmaidmen@ichips.intel.com
  

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Alsop, Thomas R 
>Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 11:12 AM
>To: Maidment, Matthew R; sv-bc@server.eda.org
>Subject: RE: [sv-bc] e-mail ballot due Monday, Feb 18, 8AM PST
>
>Yes on 1828 with the friendly amendment that we change 
>"should" to "shall".  "Should" is still a recommendation, 
>albeit stronger that "can".  "shall" requires implementations 
>to issue these warnings.  My only hesitation would be the 
>forced requirement on _all_ implementations.  I am not sure 
>that simulation tools care about this as much as synthesis 
>implementations so I'll let the software folks make that 
>judgment call. IMHO, I would personally like even simulation 
>tools to make this check if they are not already doing so and 
>issue the warning.
>
>2008 - Yes
>
>2219 - Yes. 
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org 
>[mailto:owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org] On
>>Behalf Of Maidment, Matthew R
>>Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 1:57 AM
>>To: sv-bc@server.eda.org
>>Subject: [sv-bc] e-mail ballot due Monday, Feb 18, 8AM PST
>>
>>
>>-You have until 8am PST, Monday, February 18, 2008 to respond
>>-An issue passes if there are zero NO votes and half of the eligible
>> voters respond with a YES vote.
>>-If you vote NO on any issue, your vote must be accompanied 
>by a reason.
>> The issue will then be up for discussion during a future conference
>>call.
>>-Note: For some issues, the proposed action is captured in 
>the bug note
>>       (resolve as duplicate, already addressed, etc.).
>>
>>As of the February 4, 2008 meeting, the eligible voters are:
>>
>>Brad Pierce
>>Shalom Bresticker
>>Cliff Cummings
>>Mark Hartoog
>>Francoise Martinolle
>>Karen Pieper
>>Dave Rich
>>Steven Sharp
>>Gordon Vreugdenhil
>>Stu Sutherland
>>Alex Gran
>>Don Mills
>>Heath Chambers
>>Tom Alsop
>>Doug Warmke
>>Mike Burns
>>
>>SVDB 1828 ___Yes   ___No
>>http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1828
>>
>>SVDB 2008 ___Yes   ___No
>>http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2008
>>
>>SVDB 2219 ___Yes   ___No
>>http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2219
>>
>>--
>>This message has been scanned for viruses and
>>dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
>>believed to be clean.
>>
>
>

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.