Shalom, > If you still think that the approved proposal for Mantis 1707 > covers Manti 1526 and 1709 also I am confident that it does. 1526 (Brad Pierce) and 1709 (Dave Rich) say pretty much the same thing, and I believe the following text from the approved proposal for 1707 (and related text on casting) covers it: It shall be an error to use a streaming_concatenation as an operand in an expression without first casting it to a bit-stream type. When a streaming_concatenation is used as the source of an assignment, the target of that assignment shall be either a data object of bit-stream type or a streaming_concatenation. > I suggest we move them from SV-BC to SV-EC and have SV-EC close them. Seems sensible to me, but obviously I'd like Brad and Dave to nod their approval first. -- Jonathan Bromley, Consultant DOULOS - Developing Design Know-how VHDL * Verilog * SystemC * e * Perl * Tcl/Tk * Project Services Doulos Ltd. Church Hatch, 22 Market Place, Ringwood, Hampshire, BH24 1AW, UK Tel: +44 (0)1425 471223 Email: jonathan.bromley@doulos.com Fax: +44 (0)1425 471573 Web: http://www.doulos.com The contents of this message may contain personal views which are not the views of Doulos Ltd., unless specifically stated. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Mon Feb 11 02:46:04 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Feb 11 2008 - 02:46:36 PST