Given the definition of "should" in 1.5, I agree the "should" is appropriate in the contexts indicated by 1858. If someone wants to make a proposal, I wouldn't object. I'm not going to offer to write the proposal however. Gord. Maidment, Matthew R wrote: > I've added a bug note for 1828 > > http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1828 > > Would SV-BC members please comment on this issue? > > I can see 2 outcomes: > > resolve with no action > create proposal to change 'may' or 'can' to 'should' for always_* > > > Matt > -- > Matt Maidment > mmaidmen@ichips.intel.com > > > -- -------------------------------------------------------------------- Gordon Vreugdenhil 503-685-0808 Model Technology (Mentor Graphics) gordonv@model.com -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Mon Feb 4 13:37:38 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Feb 04 2008 - 13:38:26 PST