RE: [sv-bc] initial construct BNF

I found that this was originally proposed in
http://www.eda-stds.org/sv-bc/hm/0610.html as part of a general change
to allow empty statements. 

But that proposal originally had 'always statement_or_null' as well. 

I did not find when 'always' was changed back to just 'statement' and
not 'statement_or_null'. I did not find discussion on it. 

Shalom

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org 
> [mailto:owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Bresticker, Shalom
> Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 2:23 PM
> To: Jonathan Bromley; sv-bc
> Subject: RE: [sv-bc] initial construct BNF
> 
> Hi, 
> 
> > An empty "initial" is not crazy, and could easily be created by a 
> > parameterised macro in some situations.
> 
> Yes, I agree it could, but it was not in 1364-2001 or even 1364-2005.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.