I thought about that nit-pick, but the following paragraph talks about assigning values to signed and unsigned nets and variables, so I preferred to leave it this way, because one assigns a value to a data object, not to a data type. Regards, Shalom > Nice normalization. One tiny nit-pick about the wording: > surely the signing is a property of the *data type*, rather > than of the net or variable? There's probably no reasonable > room for confusion, though. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Fri Jan 25 05:00:01 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jan 25 2008 - 05:00:12 PST