RE: [sv-bc] Mantis 1984

We had a "very large customer" ask us to support 

module test(output o);
  reg o;
endmodule

So I'm assuming some interpreted that to be legal and implemented it.


Dave



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steven Sharp [mailto:sharp@cadence.com]
> Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007 8:52 AM
> To: sharp@cadence.com; sv-bc@eda-stds.org; Brad.Pierce@synopsys.com;
Rich,
> Dave
> Subject: RE: [sv-bc] Mantis 1984
> 
> 
> >So what do people do with
> >
> >module test(input int i, output o);
> >bit o;
> >endmodule
> 
> This is clearly erroneous, since it has an additional declaration for
o
> after declaring it in an ANSI-style declaration.  The LRM does not
allow
> that.
> 
> Is that what you were asking, or did you want to ask about a different
> legal case?
> 
> Steven Sharp
> sharp@cadence.com


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.