>From: "Bresticker, Shalom" <shalom.bresticker@intel.com> > > >It is not even clear from the LRM that it is legal to instantiate a >nested module from a scope which is lexically nested within the scope >where the nested module is declared. I don't object to it, but the LRM >does not make it clear that it is allowed. An intermediate interpretation of that text would be that it is legal, but names cannot be bound lexically to the outer module in that case. Whether it is illegal, legal but cannot bind lexically, or legal but binds from the point of instantiation, the text does not appear to support Gord's interpretation. Does someone know the original intent? Steven Sharp sharp@cadence.com -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Mon Dec 3 19:59:08 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Dec 03 2007 - 19:59:25 PST