RE: [sv-bc] e-mail ballot: respond by Dec 3, 8am PST

From: Francoise Martinolle <fm_at_.....>
Date: Mon Dec 03 2007 - 09:05:41 PST
 My votes below:


SVDB  329 _X__Yes   __No  
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=329

	
SVDB 1338 __Yes   _X__No  
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1338
I think that there is a problem in the text describing " followed by `"

SVDB 1339 _X_Yes   ___No
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1339

SVDB 1548 __Yes   ___No
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1548

SVDB 1571 _X__Yes   __No  
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1571

SVDB 1619 _X_Yes   ___No
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1619

SVDB 1957 _X__Yes   __No  
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1957


SVDB 2102 _X_Yes   ___No  
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2102

SVDB 2106 ___Yes   _X_No  
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2106

I am opposed to say that importing a type from a package may resolved a
forward type
declaration.

SVDB 2152 _X_Yes   ___No  
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2152

SVDB 2163 _X_Yes   ___No  
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2163

SVDB 2169 __Yes   _X__No  
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2169
I have some concerns about using the terminology fixed part select
to mean a regular part select in contrast with an indexed part select.
WHy not calling it a part select. Why fixed?

SVDB 2170 _X_Yes   ___No  
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2170

SVDB 2178 _X_Yes   ___No  
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2178

SVDB 2184 ___Yes   _X_No  
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2184

I have reservations to allow the query functions to be constant
functions even
if the arguments are not constant.

SVDB 2217 _X_Yes   ___No  
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2217

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Mon Dec 3 09:06:13 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Dec 03 2007 - 09:06:36 PST