RE: [sv-bc] e-mail ballot: respond by Dec 3, 8am PST

I will only note that this was explicitly mentioned in the introduction
to the proposal.

Shalom
 

> >SVDB 1619 ___Yes   _X_No
> >http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1619
> 
> I still have some concerns with some of the wording.
> 
> On reading the proposal, I also realized that there is some 
> potential for visual confusion between default values for 
> input ports and initializers for output ports.  I had not 
> noticed previously that initializers were allowed for output 
> ports.  Given the rules for implicit port directions and 
> inheriting port directions, the direction of a port may not 
> always be immediately obvious.  A reader could then easily 
> confuse a default value with an initializer, and then have 
> trouble understanding why their port is not behaving as they 
> expect.  I don't know if this is a big issue, but it is one I 
> had not noticed before.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.