RE: [sv-bc] e-mail ballot: respond by Dec 3, 8am PST

From: Steven Sharp <sharp_at_.....>
Date: Fri Nov 30 2007 - 17:48:39 PST
>>SVDB 2102 ___Yes   _XX__No  
>>http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2102
>
>  Reasons -- I find the proposed language confusing. As Shalom asked,
>why can't I have multiple continuous assignments to the same element as
>long as they are to different bits?  Also, it's not clear that it's
>still illegal to mix procedural and continuous assignments to the same
>bit. (Or is that to the same element? I can't tell.) 

I have uploaded a revised proposal that attempts to clarify that
distinct bits are independent elements of packed types.

Steven Sharp
sharp@cadence.com


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Fri Nov 30 17:48:56 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Nov 30 2007 - 17:49:26 PST