Hi, > > SVDB 1338 _X_Yes ___No > > http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1338 > > Yes on 1338 (the V5 proposal) but I would suggest a friendly > amendment. > > The sentence: > A string literal embedded inside a macro will not replace > macro arguments > or embedded macros within that string. > seems a bit awkward. How about: > Macros and macro arguments within a string literal shall > not be replaced when the string literal occurs within macro text. I would go with something like, "Macro usages and formal arguments appearing within a string literal shall not be replaced when the string literal occurs within macro text." Actually, I would suggest replacing the usage of "usage" with respect to macros by "call" everywhere in 21.5. Shalom --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Tue Nov 27 10:06:23 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Nov 27 2007 - 10:07:01 PST