Is there a sane case where i++ would be used as a unique case_item expression? Is there a justification for making the tool give it special treatment, e.g., "do the evaluation in a temporary space for evaluating uniqueness, and throw the result away if that branch is not the one to be executed?" > Is a list of four thoughts more than two cents worth? :) Depends whether the list is short-circuited... Regards, Shalom --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Mon Nov 19 09:24:01 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Nov 19 2007 - 09:24:46 PST