Jonathan Bromley wrote: [...] >> If the size exceeds the maximum number of elements of >> a bounded queue, >> then elements beyond the upper bound of the target >> shall be ignored and a warning shall be issued. >> I'm not sure that I like this behavior for queues. > > I don't like it much either, but I was trying to match the > behaviour already defined for writing past the end of a > bounded queue. > >> either make it illegal, or make it silent, or require >> warnings for push_back and similar past the end of a >> fixed size queue. > > The existing text of clause 7 already demands that a warning > be issued, and I *thought* I'd said the same in the text > you quote. But I'd be very happy to change it (in both > places) if the committee thinks it should be changed. Sure enough -- I had missed that there was a required warning already. I have looked at the push_back, etc. description but overlooked the earlier more general requirement. So the warning requirement is consistent with the other queue language. Thanks for taking this on Jonathan! Gord. -- -------------------------------------------------------------------- Gordon Vreugdenhil 503-685-0808 Model Technology (Mentor Graphics) gordonv@model.com -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Mon Nov 19 08:45:57 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Nov 19 2007 - 08:46:23 PST