>From: "Rich, Dave" <Dave_Rich@mentor.com> >The rules you quoted are now in 11.7.2 and I would say they are weak >because by that step, the signedness has already been determined. It >also conflict's with what's in 11.4.5. I interpret the rules in 11.4.5 >to apply to any expression and not a simplification that only applies to >simple operands. I don't think you want to try to argue that the simplified descriptions under the different operators take precedence over the full size/type rules. Not only is there plenty of evidence to the contrary, but I suspect that your own implementation will disagree with you on most of them. Steven Sharp sharp@cadence.com -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Fri Nov 2 15:13:49 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Nov 02 2007 - 15:15:26 PDT