RE: [sv-bc] Mantis 1573

I believe that port coercion can only happen if both sides of the
connection are nets, not just if the port declarations are nets. As soon
as one side has a variable, then the rules for connections to variables
indicate that an implicit continuous assignment is created, thus the
direction can no longer be coerced. 

 

This section really belongs in 22.3.3.3 Port connection rules for nets,
just before mentioning additional rules in 22.3.3.7 or you could put
this in the latter section. Port coercion is really due in part to the
fact that the port is collapsed. 

 

Dave

 

 

________________________________

From: owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org] On
Behalf Of Bresticker, Shalom
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 12:13 AM
To: sv-bc@server.eda.org
Subject: [sv-bc] Mantis 1573

 

I revised the proposal to Mantis 1573 to apply only to net ports, not to
variable ports. See Mantis 1744. 

Shalom <<1573_D4_port coercion.V2.htm>> 

Shalom Bresticker 
Intel Jerusalem LAD DA 
+972 2 589-6852 
+972 54 721-1033 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited
 
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and 
dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is

believed to be clean. 

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.