>From: "Clifford E. Cummings" <cliffc@sunburst-design.com> >Shalom pointed out SVDB 1660. I'm not sure if it is clear that >unconnected ports must be explicitly listed as empty ports (i.e. >... .port1(), ... when instantiating a module with an unconnected >port. What do SV-BC members think? The only time unconnected ports must be explicitly listed as empty ports is when you are using .* for the port connections. That is because .* is a request to connect all ports. In all other situations, unmentioned ports are unconnected, regardless of whether you specify the connected ports with .name or .name(signal). Stu said at today's SV-BC meeting that you and he intended it to work differently, but neither the LRM text nor anyone else at the meeting supported that interpretation. Steven Sharp sharp@cadence.com -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Mon Oct 15 17:31:11 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Oct 15 2007 - 17:31:24 PDT