>From: "Seligman, Erik" <erik.seligman@intel.com> >>Proposal (off the cuff) -- unique/priority assertions should be ignored >>if they occur during the evaluation of a procedural continuous assign >>or any system task (which would include user define arg evaluations as >>well). >> >>Would anyone worry about those? > >>I don't think that anyone is likely to worry about them. > > >I'm not so sure about this. Won't cases like 'assign a = f(b);' need to >be supported, where the assertion occurs inside function 'f'? I would guess that you are talking about a continuous assignment here. If so, we don't have a problem with those. What we are talking about are procedural continuous assignments, which are a different construct. You may not even know that they exist, which is why I don't think you will worry about them. If you are talking about procedural continuous assignments, I am interested in hearing about the use you have in mind for them. Steven Sharp sharp@cadence.com -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Fri Oct 12 19:37:21 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Oct 12 2007 - 19:37:31 PDT