What I see in Draft 4 is that all of 34.10 has been struck out in red, in accordance with Mantis 1859. Accordingly, the two editor's questions there, "Should this be DPI-C?" have been struck out as well. Sorry, I should have deleted that question from the list. I started with the list from Draft 3a, updated it to Draft 4, and missed that that question was deleted entirely. Shalom 34.10: I can no longer see the question in Draft4, but I do see all the strike-through text. (Maybe my Acrobat is acting up again, though I do see other questions). I remember Stu asked SV-CC this question some months back, and the answer was "Yes", the text is redundant and can be removed. 34.10: This subclause seems to be mostly, if not entirely, redundant with the rest of this Clause. Can this subclause be deleted? If not, can the redundant text be replaced with cross references? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Thu Oct 11 12:16:37 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Oct 11 2007 - 12:16:53 PDT