>From: "Bresticker, Shalom" <shalom.bresticker@intel.com> >Actually, is it legal to do a procedural continuous assignment to a >variable driven by a continuous assignment? I thought not. And if not, >then that entire part of the text in 10.6.1 should be deleted. I believe that procedural continuous assignments were deliberately not classified as procedural assignments, probably so that forces (which are a type of procedural continuous assignment) could be used on them. Steven Sharp sharp@cadence.com -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Thu Oct 11 11:32:35 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Oct 11 2007 - 11:32:54 PDT