RE: [sv-bc] Need your review of Mantis item 1741

From: Brad Pierce <Brad.Pierce_at_.....>
Date: Tue Sep 04 2007 - 13:34:01 PDT
Would a hierarchical reference to BLK.v from outside the unnamed
begin-end be legal in the following example?

    begin
      begin : BLK
        var v = 1'b1;  // Is this decl contained in the unnamed begin?
      end
    end
 
-- Brad

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On Behalf Of Jim
Vellenga
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 1:25 PM
To: sv-bc
Cc: sv-cc@eda-stds.org
Subject: [sv-bc] Need your review of Mantis item 1741

SV-BC,

As directed by the Champions, I am requesting your review of Mantis item
1741 with respect to the question of when an unnamed block does or does
not constitute a scope.

In my append to 1741 of August 13, I have included a statement from
Steve Sharp as to the reasons why we should consider an unnamed begin or
unnamed fork to be a scope if and only if it contains a block item
declaration.

Please review this soon so that we can include the revised proposal in
the upcoming version of the standard.

Regards,
Jim Vellenga 

--------------------------------------------------------- 
James H. Vellenga                            978-262-6381 
Software Architect                              (FAX) 978-262-6636 
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.         vellenga@cadence.com 
270 Billerica Rd
Chelmsford, MA 01824-4179
"We all work with partial information." 
---------------------------------------------------------- 

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by
MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.



-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Tue Sep 4 13:34:50 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Sep 04 2007 - 13:35:12 PDT