[sv-bc] RE: [sv-ec] Confusing packed struct assignment rules in LRM

From: Bresticker, Shalom <shalom.bresticker_at_.....>
Date: Sun Sep 02 2007 - 01:52:08 PDT
Brian,
 
It is not clear to me what your difficulty is with the first set of
examples, which are intended to be taken as a collective example. Please
clarify.
 
Also, just to be sure, the second set of examples, the illegal ones, are
intended to be read as a continuation of the first set, not as an
independent set.


	However the first set of examples seems to suggest otherwise if
the reader sees them as a collective example rather than discrete
examples taken on their own.  The next set of illegal examples I believe
are to be read as a set.  Meaning you can't do both assign types
together.
	
	Regards,
	Shalom 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Sun Sep 2 01:52:37 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Sep 02 2007 - 01:53:12 PDT