RE: [sv-bc] RE: [sv-ac] call to vote on Mantis 1681

Hi John,

What is your opinion?

Thanks,
Dmitry

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org] On
Behalf Of Bresticker, Shalom
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 10:42 AM
To: Bassam Tabbara; john.havlicek@freescale.com;
sv-ac@server.eda-stds.org
Cc: sv-bc@server.eda.org
Subject: [sv-bc] RE: [sv-ac] call to vote on Mantis 1681

I don't think that modifying the `begin_keywords section should be
within the scope of this Mantis or at all within the scope of SV-AC.

Otherwise, any other proposal from this committee or any other committee
that adds a keyword will have to include those same modifications,
because any of those proposals may not pass. That will be unhealthy
duplication, and in any case, not in the scope of SV-AC.

I think the proposal should only modify Annex B, the list of current
keywords, with a note to SV-BC about it, and a note in Mantis 1846, the
issue for updating the keyword lists, as I have just done.

Thanks,
Shalom 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org 
> [mailto:owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Bassam Tabbara
> Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 11:00 PM
> To: john.havlicek@freescale.com; sv-ac@server.eda-stds.org
> Subject: RE: [sv-ac] call to vote on Mantis 1681
> 
> I vote yes. *VERY MINOR* friendly amendment:
> 
> version_specifier ::=
> 1800-2008
> 1800-2005                       <<<<<<<<<< Add "|"
> | 1364-2005
> | 1364-2001
> | 1364-2001-noconfig
> | 1364-1995
> 
> 
> Thx.
> -Bassam.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On 
> Behalf Of John
> Havlicek
> Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 11:55 AM
> To: sv-ac@eda-stds.org
> Subject: [sv-ac] call to vote on Mantis 1681
> 
> All:
> 
> This is the call to vote on the proposal for Mantis 1681.
> 
> Please vote if you are eligible.  See the details below.
> 
> J.H.
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
> 
> Ballot on Mantis 1681
> 
> - Called on 2007-07-24, final ballots due by 23:59 PDT on 2007-07-31.
> 
>  v[x-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx-xx] Doron Bustan (Freescale)
>  v[xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx-x] Eduard Cerny (Synopsys)	
>  n[--x-xxx---------x-x-xxx-x---x] Surrendra Dudani (Synopsys)
> v[xxxxx-xx-xxxxx-xxx-xxx-------] Yaniv Fais (Freescale)
> t[xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] John Havlicek (Freescale - Chair)
> v[xxxxxxxxxxxrxxxxxxxxxxxxx-xxx] Dmitry Korchemny (Intel - Co-Chair)
> n[x--xx--xxxxx----------xx-xxxx] Manisha Kulshrestha (Mentor Graphics)
> n[----------xxxxx-------x-xx-x-] Jiang Long (Mentor Graphics)
> n[--x--xxx.....................] Joseph Lu (Altera)
> n[-------x--x-xx--xx-xxxxxxx-x-] Hillel Miller (Freescale)
> v[xxxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxx] Lisa Piper (Cadence)
> v[x-x-xxxxx-x..................] Erik Seligman (Intel)
> n[---xxxx-----xxxx-xx----------] Tej Singh (Mentor Graphics)
> v[xxxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Bassam Tabbara (Synopsys)
> v[xxx-xxxxxxxxxx...............] Tom Thatcher (Sun Microsystems)
>    |----------------------------- attendance on 2007-07-24
>  |------------------------------- voting eligibility for this ballot
> |-------------------------------- email ballots received
> 
> 
> 	Legend:
> 		x = attended
> 		- = missed
> 		r = represented
> 		. = not yet a member
> 		v = valid voter (2 out of last 3 or 3/4 overall)
> 		n = not valid voter
>                 t = chair eligible to vote only to make or break a tie
> 
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by
> MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
> 
> 
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
> 

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.