[sv-bc] Agenda: July 23 SV-BC Meeting

SV-BC Meeting
Date: Monday July 23, 2007
Time: 09:00am-11:00am PDT

Toll Free Dial In Number: (888)635-9997
International Access/Caller Paid Dial In Number: (763)315-6815
PARTICIPANT CODE: 53904

Agenda

+ Review IEEE patent policy
  http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-slideset.ppt
 
+ Review Minutes of Previous Meeting
  http://www.eda-stds.org/sv-bc/minutes/sv-bc_07_07_09.txt

+ Status of Draft 3 Review
  Reviewers, please provide brief update on progress

+ Issues

  1602 (http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1602)
   Gord asked to discuss this

   331 (http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=331)
   661 (http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=661)
   916 (http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=916)
  1090 (http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1090)
  1209 (http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1209)
  1331 (http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1331)
  1444 (http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1444)
  1548 (http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1548)
  1651 (http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1651)
  1745 (http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1745)
  1935 (http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1935)
  1939 (http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1939)
  1945 (http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1945)
   

+ Cliff's case statement syntax

  Left the discussion with interest in a parallel but not full case
  modifier.  If someone has a proposal about this, we can review.


Action Items
Action Items
Complete
07/09/2007 Shalom proposal for SVDB 1119 to include friendly amendment
07/09/2007 Matt update proposal for SVDB 1341 with friendly amendment

Pending
01/09/2006 Shalom file new issure related to SVDB 1254 and include
example
03/27/2006 Cliff post examples demonstrating the need for 0-1 wildcard 
           to justify further action on SVDB 99

           Other ideas: elsex, defaultx, ifx, alwaysx, initialx,
           Question: what about X expression in index of Vector or
           array expressions (a[i] where i === 'X).  Cliff to pursue
further
           action.
04/10/2006 Steven to create proposal for SVDB 1386
04/10/2006 Steven to create proposal for SVDB 1078
06/19/2006 Francoise check with SV-CC regariding suitability of data
read API
           to address debugging of "dynamic data" in lieu of vcd
extensions.
07/10/2006 Steve add bugnote to 1043 about specifics for resolution
07/31/2006 Steve add bug note to 1481 with details for a clearer
proposal
09/25/2006 Matt add SVDB entry to request capability to packages: 
           import/export & non-exported (local) package declarations.
10/09/2006 Brad: enhance 1554 proposal to prevent circularity of
expressions
           (address use or non-use of hierarchical references).
10/23/2006 Matt send example of use of forward typedef.
12/04/2006 Shalom present compelling example of `begin_define --
`end_define
12/18/2006 Cliff open Mantis item about 'predefault' with compelling
examples
01/08/2007 Vendors to describe interpretation of a path when there are
           multiple drivers involved and share test cases on reflector.
03/05/2007 ALL look at SV-AC items and send Matt a note if you require
more
           information to address them.  Matt will work with SV-AC to
get
           additional information. 
03/19/2007 Cliff send e-mail to Karen regarding SVDB account

04/26/2007 All: Revisit concept of memory in Draft 3

           Affects PLI backward compatibility and readmem system tasks.
           After some discussion, ambivalence gave way to agreement that
           arrays and memories as covered in 7.4 need to be revisited 
           for clarification.  SVDB 1362 covers this issue. Dave will
           start working on it.

06/11/2007 Stu reword proposal for SVDB 1111
06/11/2007 Matt notify SV-AC to update 1641 to system task/function
section
06/11/2007 Mark attempt to define 'variation' in context of resolving
SVDB 1850
06/25/2007 Gord add new SVDB entry and proposal to address expression
sizing
           issues for literals of unspecified widths.
06/25/2007 Steve look into ability to use 1800 types with old-style port
decls

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.