RE: [sv-bc] array/struct literals

From: Bresticker, Shalom <shalom.bresticker_at_.....>
Date: Thu Jul 19 2007 - 06:11:39 PDT
I thought a long time ago already that the sections on aggregate
literals and on assignment patterns should be combined, as they largely
duplicate each other.

Shalom 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Graham [mailto:pgraham@cadence.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 4:09 PM
> To: Bresticker, Shalom
> Cc: sv-bc@eda.org
> Subject: [sv-bc] array/struct literals
> 
> Bresticker, Shalom writes:
>  > This may be picky, but ...
>  >
>  > 5.10 says, "Structure literals are structure assignment 
> patterns or  > pattern expressions with constant member expressions."
> 
> I don't see why structure literals are even mentioned.  They 
> are not literals in the sense of being primitive language 
> elements.  They are complex expressions that happen to be 
> made up of constant expressions.  If we have a section for 
> structure literals, then why not one for concat literals, 
> i.e., constant-valued concatenations?
> 
> Paul
> 

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Thu Jul 19 06:14:46 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jul 19 2007 - 06:15:10 PDT