Re: [sv-bc] Mantis 1090: `undefineall

From: Steven Sharp <sharp_at_.....>
Date: Mon Jul 16 2007 - 11:45:49 PDT
>From: Gordon Vreugdenhil <gordonv@model.com>

>Certainly in the LRM (1364 or 1800) so far there has been no discussion
>of "command line" setting of macros.  As far as the LRM is concerned,
>this doesn't occur.
>
>So, if we want to address this from the LRM perspective, we'll have
>to agree to add discussion in the LRM regarding command line setup.

I agree that this is outside the historical scope of the LRM, and think
it is reasonable to remain so.

It may still be helpful to keep it in mind while considering the wording
of this proposal.  It would be better not to say that it undefines all
macros, instead saying something about eliminating the effects of `define
directives.  Or that it has the effect of a `undef applied to all defined
macros.  However, the description of `undef may have already made this
mistake.

Steven Sharp
sharp@cadence.com


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Mon Jul 16 11:46:11 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jul 16 2007 - 11:46:22 PDT