RE: [sv-bc] E-mail Vote: Respond by Monday, July 9, 8AM PDT

From: Stuart Sutherland <stuart_at_.....>
Date: Sun Jul 08 2007 - 22:39:31 PDT
Here's my votes.  I am teaching a class this week, and will not be able to
join either the SV-BC or SV-EC conference calls.  Sorry to miss out on the
fun ;)

 
> SVDB 1119 _X_Yes   ___No  
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1119
> 
> SVDB 1233 _X_Yes   ___No  
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1233
> 
> SVDB 1280 _X_Yes   ___No  
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1280
> 
> SVDB 1341 ___Yes   _X_No  
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1341
The placement of the new sentence, and the fact that it refers to "this
directive", make the new sentence seem to apply to only the `end_keywords
directive.  I will change my vote to yes with the friendly amendment of
changing "this directive" to "these directives" in the proposed new
sentence.

> 
> SVDB 1351 _X_Yes   ___No  
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1351
> 
> SVDB 1462 _X_Yes   ___No  
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1462
> 
> SVDB 1625 _X_Yes   ___No  
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1625
> NOTE: Brad proposes that this is no longer as issue
> and should be resolved with no action required.

I am voting yes to close 1623 with no action required.

> 
> SVDB 1814 _X_Yes   ___No  
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1814
> 
> SVDB 1899 _X_Yes   ___No  
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1899
> 

Stu
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Stuart Sutherland
Sutherland HDL, Inc.
stuart@sutherland-hdl.com
503-692-0898
 



-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Sun Jul 8 22:39:53 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Jul 08 2007 - 22:40:08 PDT