RE: [sv-bc] Case Statement Enhancement Proposal Idea

From: Bresticker, Shalom <shalom.bresticker_at_.....>
Date: Sun Jul 08 2007 - 19:50:55 PDT

Isn't that exactly what always_* are ?

> I'm really disturbed by the idea of introducing syntax
> crafted solely to simplify a specific kind of "set-piece"
> design.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

Received on Sun Jul 8 19:51:39 2007

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Clifford E. Cummings: "RE: [sv-bc] -dangles Proposal"
Previous message: Gran, Alex: "RE: [sv-bc] E-mail Vote: Respond by Monday, July 9, 8AM PDT"
In reply to: Jonathan Bromley: "RE: [sv-bc] Case Statement Enhancement Proposal Idea"
Next in thread: Steven Sharp: "RE: [sv-bc] Case Statement Enhancement Proposal Idea"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Jul 08 2007 - 19:51:52 PDT