Yes on all - a couple of notes/suggestions below. Maidment, Matthew R wrote: [...]> > SVDB 965 _X_Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=965 > > SVDB 1004 _X_Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1004 > > SVDB 1064 _X_Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1064 > > SVDB 1101 _X_Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1101 > > SVDB 1111 _X_Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1111 > > SVDB 1143 _X_Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1143 Just to be clear - the "yes" means "close the mantis item with no action". If that is not the case, I withdraw my "yes". > SVDB 1257 _X_Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1257 > > SVDB 1388 _X_Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1388 > > SVDB 1400 _X_Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1400 > > SVDB 1497 _X_Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1497 > > SVDB 1499 _X_Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1499 > > SVDB 1505 _X_Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1505 > > SVDB 1562 _X_Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1562 Friendly suggestion -- a note to the editor should be added to the proposal to highlight the exact change. > SVDB 1589 _X_Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1589 > > SVDB 1597 _X_Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1597 > > SVDB 1606 _X_Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1606 > SVDB 1620 _X_Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1620 Just to be clear here - the 1620 vote is to "close as duplicate". If that is not the case, I withdraw my "yes". > SVDB 1641 _X_Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1641 > > SVDB 1644 _X_Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1644 > > SVDB 1660 _X_Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1660 > > SVDB 1666 _X_Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1666 > > SVDB 1746 _X_Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1746 Friendly question/comment -- should we include "M" and "L" in addition to "m" and "l"? Also, the "CHANGE" part of the proposal should have the change part in red, not blue. > SVDB 1748 _X_Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1748 > > SVDB 1749 _X_Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1749 > > SVDB 1762 _X_Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1762 > > SVDB 1783 _X_Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1783 > > SVDB 1788 _X_Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1788 I don't object to the point change in 1788 but the overall statement here is not correct since names can also refer to scopes other than instance names. > SVDB 1807 _X_Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1807 > > SVDB 1821 _X_Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1821 > > SVDB 1825 _X_Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1825 Just to be clear here - the 1825 vote is to "close as duplicate". If that is not the case, I withdraw my "yes". > > SVDB 1831 _X_Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1831 > > SVDB 1850 _X_Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1850 > -- -------------------------------------------------------------------- Gordon Vreugdenhil 503-685-0808 Model Technology (Mentor Graphics) gordonv@model.com -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Mon Jun 4 13:04:07 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jun 04 2007 - 13:04:14 PDT