Date: Tue May 08 2007 - 09:59:30 PDT
I want to follow-up on this. I exchanged mails with Karen on how to proceed. She replied that all further issues are to be addressed through our regular process: filed in SVDB, brought to vote in SV-BC, passed to the Champions, etc. I encourage review of these clauses, just make sure to file the issues in the SVDB. We can further plan/discuss how to most effectively address LRM merge issues during Monday's SV-BC meeting. Thanks, Matt -- Matt Maidment mmaidmen@ichips.intel.com ________________________________ From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On Behalf Of Bresticker, Shalom Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 2:06 AM To: sv-bc@eda.org Subject: [sv-bc] reviewing draft 3 We need to review especially those sections in draft 3 where there was substantial merging that was not yet complete in draft 2, particularly clauses 20 and 22. Shalom Shalom Bresticker Intel Jerusalem LAD DA +972 2 589-6852 +972 54 721-1033 -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
