RE: [sv-bc] Function return values

From: Bresticker, Shalom <shalom.bresticker_at_.....>
Date: Sat Mar 03 2007 - 23:13:05 PST
I understand. But those vendors who have implemented a transaction
recording scheme have a way of handling that, don't they?

Shalom


> And, BTW, dumping automatics is not so much a lifetime issue as a
naming
> problem. It would not be difficult to arrange for the simulator to
dump
> automatics every time an automatic task or function is called. But,
when
> the same function is called more than once in the same time slot (or
> recursively), the names used in the dump must be unique, simple, and
> meaningful to designers. Finding such a naming scheme is a challenge.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Sat Mar 3 23:14:05 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Mar 03 2007 - 23:14:26 PST